《君主论-the prince(英文版)》the prince(英文版)-第17章

iberal；　I　reply：　Either　a　prince　spendsthat　which　is　his　own　or　his　subjects"　or　else　that　of　others。　In　thefirst　case　he　ought　to　be　sparing；　in　the　second　he　ought　not　to　neglectany　opportunity　for　liberality。　And　to　the　price　who　goes　forth　with　hisarmy；　supporting　it　by　pillage；　sack；　and　extortion；　handling　that　whichbelongs　to　others；　this　liberality　is　necessary；　otherwise　he　would　notbe　followed　by　soldiers。　And　of　that　which　is　neither　yours　nor　yoursubjects"　you　can　be　a　ready　giver；　as　were　Cyrus；　Caesar；　andAlexander；　because　it　does　not　take　away　your　reputation　if　you　squanderthat　of　others；　but　adds　to　it；　it　is　only　squandering　your　own　thatinjures　you。And　there　is　nothing　wastes　so　rapidly　as　liberality；　for　even　whilstyou　exercise　it　you　lose　the　power　to　do　so；　and　so　bee　either　pooror　despised；　or　else；　in　avoiding　poverty；　rapacious　and　hated。　And　aprince　should　guard　himself；　above　all　things；　against　being　despisedand　hated；　and　liberality　leads　you　to　both。　Therefore　it　is　wiser　tohave　a　reputation　for　meanness　which　brings　reproach　without　hatred；than　to　be　pelled　through　seeking　a　reputation　for　liberality　toincur　a　name　for　rapacity　which　begets　reproach　with　hatred。CHAPTER　XVIICONCERNING　CRUELTY　AND　CLEMENCY；　AND　WHETHER　IT　IS　BETTER　TO　BE　LOVEDTHAN　FEAREDING　noentioned　above；　I　say　that　everyprince　ought　to　desire　to　be　considered　clement　and　not　cruel。Nevertheless　he　ought　to　take　care　not　to　misuse　this　clemency。　CesareBorgia　was　considered　cruel；　notwithstanding；　his　cruelty　reconciled　theRomagna；　unified　it；　and　restored　it　to　peace　and　loyalty。　And　if　thisbe　rightly　considered；　he　will　be　seen　to　have　been　much　more　mercifulthan　the　Florentine　people；　who；　to　avoid　a　reputation　for　cruelty；permitted　Pistoia　to　be　destroyed。　Therefore　a　prince；　so　long　as　hekeeps　his　subjects　united　and　loyal；　ought　not　to　mind　the　reproach　ofcruelty；　because　with　a　few　examples　he　will　be　more　merciful　than　thosewho；　through　too　much　mercy；　allow　disorders　to　arise；　from　which　followmurders　or　robberies；　for　these　are　wont　to　injure　the　whole　people；whilst　those　executions　which　originate　with　a　prince　offend　theindividual　only。And　of　all　princes；　it　is　impossible　for　the　new　prince　to　avoid　theimputation　of　cruelty；　owing　to　new　states　being　full　of　dangers。　HenceVirgil；　through　the　mouth　of　Dido；　excuses　the　inhumanity　of　her　reignowing　to　its　being　new；　saying： Res　dura；　et　regni　novitas　me　talia　cogunt Moliri；　et　late　fines　custode　tueri。　＇1＇Nevertheless　he　ought　to　be　slow　to　believe　and　to　act；　nor　should　hehimself　show　fear；　but　proceed　in　a　temperate　manner　with　prudence　andhumanity；　so　that　too　much　confidence　may　not　make　him　incautious　andtoo　much　distrust　render　him　intolerable。Upon　this　a　question　arises：　whether　it　be　better　to　be　loved　thanfeared　or　feared　than　loved？　It　may　be　answered　that　one　should　wish　tobe　both；　but；　because　it　is　difficult　to　unite　them　in　one　person；　ismuch　safer　to　be　feared　than　loved；　when；　of　the　two；　either　must　bedispensed　with。　Because　this　is　to　be　asserted　in　general　of　men；　thatthey　are　ungrateful；　fickle；　false；　cowardly；　covetous；　and　as　long　asyou　succeed　they　are　yours　entirely；　they　will　offer　you　their　blood；property；　life　and　children；　as　is　said　above；　when　the　need　is　fardistant；　but　when　it　approaches　they　turn　against　you。　And　that　princewho；　relying　entirely　on　their　promises；　has　neglected　otherprecautions；　is　ruined；　because　friendships　that　are　obtained　bypayments；　and　not　by　greatness　or　nobility　of　mind；　may　indeed　beearned；　but　they　are　not　secured；　and　in　time　of　need　cannot　be　reliedupon；　and　men　have　less　scruple　in　offending　one　who　is　beloved　than　onewho　is　feared；　for　love　is　preserved　by　the　link　of　obligation　which；owing　to　the　baseness　of　men；　is　broken　at　every　opportunity　for　theiradvantage；　but　fear　preserves　you　by　a　dread　of　punishment　which　neverfails。Nevertheless　a　prince　ought　to　inspire　fear　in　such　a　way　that；　if　hedoes　not　win　love；　he　avoids　hatred；　because　he　can　endure　very　wellbeing　feared　whilst　he　is　not　hated；　which　will　always　be　as　long　as　heabstains　from　the　property　of　his　citizens　and　subjects　and　from　theirwomen。　But　when　it　is　necessary　for　him　to　proceed　against　the　life　ofsomeone；　he　must　do　it　on　proper　justification　and　for　manifest　cause；but　above　all　things　he　must　keep　his　hands　off　the　property　of　others；because　men　more　quickly　forget　the　death　of　their　father　than　the　lossof　their　patrimony。　Besides；　pretexts　for　taking　away　the　property　arenever　wanting；　for　he　who　has　once　begun　to　live　by　robbery　will　alwaysfind　pretexts　for　seizing　what　belongs　to　others；　but　reasons　for　takinglife；　on　the　contrary；　are　more　difficult　to　find　and　sooner　lapse。　Butwhen　a　prince　is　with　his　army；　and　has　under　control　a　multitude　ofsoldiers；　then　it　is　quite　necessary　for　him　to　disregard　the　reputationof　cruelty；　for　without　it　he　would　never　hold　his　army　united　ordisposed　to　its　duties。Among　the　wonderful　deeds　of　Hannibal　this　one　is　enumerated：　thathaving　led　an　enormous　army；　posed　of　many　various　races　of　men；　tofight　in　foreign　lands；　no　dissensions　arose　either　among　them　oragainst　the　prince；　whether　in　his　bad　or　in　his　good　fortune。　Thisarose　from　nothing　else　than　his　inhuman　cruelty；　which；　with　hisboundless　valour；　made　him　revered　and　terrible　in　the　sight　of　hissoldiers；　but　without　that　cruelty；　his　other　virtues　were　notsufficient　to　produce　this　effect。　And　shortsighted　writers　admire　hisdeeds　from　one　point　of　view　and　from　another　condemn　the　principalcause　of　them。　That　it　is　true　his　other　virtues　would　not　have　beensufficient　for　him　may　be　proved　by　the　case　of　Scipio；　that　mostexcellent　man；　not　of　his　own　times　but　within　the　memory　of　man；against　whom；　nevertheless；　his　army　rebelled　in　Spain；　this　arose　fromnothing　but　his　too　great　forbearance；　which　gave　his　soldiers　morelicence　than　is　consistent　with　military　discipline。　For　this　he　wasupbraided　in　the　Senate　by　Fabius　Maximus；　and　called　the　corrupter　ofthe　Roman　soldiery。　The　Locrians　were　laid　waste　by　a　legate　of　Scipio；yet　they　were　not　avenged　by　him；　nor　was　the　insolence　of　the　legatepunished；　owin