prudence; for time drives everything before it; andis able to bring with it good as well as evil; and evil as well as good。But let us turn to France and inquire whether she has done any of thethings mentioned。 I will speak of Louis 'XII' (and not of Charles'VIII') as the one whose conduct is the better to be observed; he havingheld possession of Italy for the longest period; and you will see thathe has done the opposite to those things which ought to be done toretain a state posed of divers elements。King Louis was brought into Italy by the ambition of the Veians; whodesired to obtain half the state of Lombardy by his intervention。 I willnot blame the course taken by the king; because; wishing to get afoothold in Italy; and having no friends there …… seeing rather thatevery door was shut to him owing to the conduct of Charles …… he wasforced to accept those friendships which he could get; and he would havesucceeded very quickly in his design if in other matters he had not madesome mistakes。 The king; hobardy; regained atonce the authority which Charles had lost: Genoa yielded; theFlorentines became his friends; the Marquess of Mantua; the Duke ofFerrara; the Bentivoglio; my lady of Forli; the Lords of Faenza; ofPesaro; of Rimini; of Camerino; of Piombino; the Lucchesi; the Pisans;the Sienese …… everybody made advances to him to bee his friend。 Thencould the Veians realize the rashness of the course taken by them;which; in order that they might secure two towns in Lombardy; had madethe king master of two…thirds of Italy。Let any one now consider with what little difficulty the king could havemaintained his position in Italy had he observed the rules above laiddown; and kept all his friends secure and protected; for although theywere numerous they were both weak and timid; some afraid of the Church;some of the Veians; and thus they would always have been forced tostand in with him; and by their means he could easily have made himselfsecure against those who remained powerful。 But he was no sooner inMilan than he did the contrary by assisting Pope Alexander to occupy theRomagna。 It never occurred to him that by this action he was weakeninghimself; depriving himself of friends and those who had thrownthemselves into his lap; whilst he aggrandized the Church by adding muchtemporal power to the spiritual; thus giving it great authority。 Andhaving mitted this prime error; he was obliged to follow it up; somuch so that; to put an end to the ambition of Alexander; and to preventhis being the master of Tuscany; he was himself forced to e intoItaly。And as if it were not enough to have aggrandized the Church; anddeprived himself friends; he; wishing to have the kingdom of Naples;divides it with the King of Spain; and where he was the prime arbiter ofItaly he takes an associate; so that the ambitious of that country andthe malcontents of his own should have where to shelter; and whereas hecould have left in the kingdom his own pensioner as king; he drove himout; to put one there who was able to drive him; Louis; out in turn。The wish to acquire is in truth very natural and mon; and men alwaysdo so when they can; and for this they will be praised not blamed; butwhen they cannot do so; yet wish to do so by any means; then there isfolly and blame。 Therefore; if France could have attacked Naples withher own forces she ought to have done so; if she could not; then sheought not to have divided it。 And if the partition which she made withthe Veians in Lombardy was justified by the excuse that by it she gota foothold in Italy; this other partition merited blame; for it had notthe excuse of that necessity。Therefore Louis made these five errors: he destroyed the minor powers;he increased the strength of one of the greater powers in Italy; hebrought in a foreign power; he did not settle in the country; he did notsend colonies。 Which errors; if he had lived; were not enough to injurehim had he not made a sixth by taking away their dominions from theVeians; because; had he not aggrandized the Church; nor brought Spaininto Italy; it would have been very reasonable and necessary to humblethem; but having first taken these steps; he ought never to haveconsented to their ruin; for they; being powerful; would always havekept off others from designs on Lombardy; to which the Veians wouldnever have consented except to bee masters themselves there; alsobecause the others would not wish to take Lombardy from France in orderto give it to the Veians; and to run counter to both they would nothave had the courage。And if any one should say: King Louis yielded the Romagna to Alexanderand the kingdom to Spain to avoid war; I answer for the reasons givenabove that a blunder ought never be perpetrated to avoid war; because itis not to be avoided; but is only deferred to your disadvantage。 And ifanother should allege the pledge which the king had given to the Popethat he would assist him in the enterprise; in exchange for thedissolution of his marriage and for the hat to Rouen; to that I replywhat I shall write later on concerning the faith of princes; and how itought to be kept。Thus King Louis lost Lombardy by not having followed any of theconditions observed by those who have taken possession of countries andwished to retain them。 Nor is there any miracle in this; but much thatis reasonable and quite natural。 And on these matters I spoke at Nanteswith Rouen; when Valentino; '1' as Cesare Borgia; the son of PopeAlexander; was usually called; occupied the Romagna; and on CardinalRouen observing to me that the Italians did not understand war; Ireplied to him that the French did not understand statecraft; meaningthat otherwise they would not have allowed the Church to reach suchgreatness。 And in fact it has been seen that the greatness of the Churchand of Spain in Italy has been caused by France; and her ruin may beattributed to them。 From this a general rule is drawn which never orrarely fails: that he who is the cause of another being powerful isruined; because that predominancy has been brought about either byastuteness or else by force; and both are distrusted by him who has beenraised to power。1。 So called …… in Italian …… from the duchy of Valentinois; conferredon him
小说推荐
- flipped(英文版)
- 手机访问 m╮欢迎光临︱田︱田田╬版 权 归 原 作 者【louise_1925】整理附】内容版权归作者所有 Page 1-Flippedby Wendelin Van Draanen Page 2-More praise for FLIPPED“We flipped over this fanta
- 激情
- 最新章:第55章
- rekindled(英文版)
- ╮欢迎光临︱田︱田田╬版 权 归 原 作 者【功夫英雄qq】整理附】内容版权归作者所有!REKINDLED[065-066-4.9]By BARBARA DELINSKYSYNOPSIS:We are calling this two-book volume Rekindled because ea
- 文学名著
- 最新章:第77章
- 简爱(英文版)
- 手机访问 m╮欢迎光临︱田︱田田╬版 权 归 原 作 者【yuzhiyuyi】整理附】内容版权归作者所有★The Bront SistersWorksWuthering HeightsAnneThe Tenant of Wildfell HallCharlotteShirleyJane EyreBi
- 文学名著
- 最新章:第168章
- 小王子 英文版
- [法 圣·德克旭贝里.献给列翁·维尔特大人是我在世界上最好的朋友。我还有另一个理由:这个大人他什么都能懂,甚至给孩子们写的书他也能懂。我的第三个理由是:这个大人住在法国,他在那里给儿童时代的这个大人。所有的大人都曾经是孩子(可惜,只有很少的一些大人记得这一点)因此,我就把献词改为:献给还是小男孩时的
- 都市言情
- 最新章:第11章
- 阿甘正传(英文版)
- ,阿甘正传(英文版)1小?说网let me say this bein a idiot is no box of chocolates people laugh losepatience treat you shabby now they says folks sposed to be kind t
- 历史军事
- 最新章:第35章
- 红字-the scarlet letter(英文版)
- 手机访问 m╮欢迎光临︱田︱田田╬版 权 归 原 作 者【冷泉泓薇】整理附】内容版权归作者所有!THE SCARLET LETTER by Nathaniel HawthorneINTRODUCTORY THE CUSTOM-HOUSE INTRODUCTORY TO"THE SCARLET LET
- 文学名著
- 最新章:the scarlet letter(英文版)-第75章
- 哲学史-philosophy of history(英文版)
- ━书香 手机访问 m╮欢迎光临︱田︱田田╬版 权 归 原 作 者●﹏≥﹏(不夜火)为你整理制作 手机访问 m╮欢迎光临︱田︱田田╬版 权 归 原 作 者━门第╯Philosophy of Historyby HegelTable of Contents
- 文学名著
- 最新章:philosophy of history(英文版)-第36章
- the underground city-地下城(英文版)
- 手机访问 m╮欢迎光临︱田︱田田╬版 权 归 原 作 者【功夫英雄qq】整理附】内容版权归作者所有!The Underground Cityby Jules VerneORThe Black Indies(Sometimes Called The Child of the Cavern)CHAPTE
- 文学名著
- 最新章:地下城(英文版)-第41章
- the hunger games-饥饿游戏(英文版)
- 手机访问 m╮欢迎光临︱田︱田田╬版 权 归 原 作 者【冷泉泓薇】整理附】内容版权归作者所有!故事背景,设定在虚拟的近未来时空。作者以简略笔法,从主角口中片断交代这样的场景:战乱后荒芜的北美洲,重回古希腊城邦式的统治形态。极少数的统治贵族,住在固若金汤的特定区域,掌管绝大多数从事生产奉献的民奴-既
- 文学名著
- 最新章:饥饿游戏(英文版)-第88章